Erratum, sorta

In a recent posting, I fulminated against CNN's failure to report civilian casualties in the Baghdad market. Recent developments force me to adjust these views somewhat.
Based on the evidence that is available now (objective facts, such as the size of the missiles' craters), it is not unlikely to assume that the bombs that fell on the market in Baghdad were, in fact, stray Iraqi missiles rather than American ones.
Does this mean I will start watching CNN again? No it won't. It's CNN's job to report events as they unfold, not to cover them up. They are still wrong.